Biden’s BBB Bill Could Add $3T to Deficits if it were Instead this Imaginary Bill Republicans Used for their New CBO Report

The Congressional Budget Office on Friday released a new analysis of House Democrats’ Build Back Better Act, finding that if most provisions in the legislation were made permanent, (something not asked of the bill) the social spending and climate plan would increase the deficit by $2.75 trillion over 10 years, or $3 trillion including interest costs.

The estimate, requested by the top Republicans on the Senate and House budget committees, could further complicate Democrats’ efforts to enact the legislation.

Republicans and budget hawks have criticized Democrats for relying on budget “gimmicks” (something we’d call creative thinking if we weren’t trying to taint public opinion of the bill) to pay for their proposed new spending, making key programs temporary to reduce the official cost of the package, even as Democrats would like to have those programs become permanent after they’ve proven themselves to be cost effective. The expanded child tax credit, for example, would expire after next year.

Advertisements
Advertisements
Advertisements

The Congressional Budget Office’s initial cost estimate, released last month, only looked at the bill as written, with those sunsets in place. It found that the bill would increase deficits by $160 billion over 10 years, or about $230 billion including interest. (The Biden administration challenged the initial estimate, arguing that its plan to beef up the IRS would generate more revenue than the budget office projected, a position independent analysis has supported greatly).

The CBO’s new analysis, requested by Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC), the ranking Republican on the Senate Budget Committee, and Rep. Jason Smith (R-MO), the top Republican on the House Budget Committee, looks at the cost of the plan if it were different than what Democrats are supporting. The gross cost would roughly double, rising from $2.4 trillion to more than $4.7 trillion. The expanded child tax credit, which costs $185 billion for one year in the official score of the bill, would cost $1.6 trillion if extended over the entire decade.

“If you believe these programs will go away in one, two, or three years, you shouldn’t have a driver’s license,” Graham told reporters Friday. “Build Back Better (the imaginary one that only exists in the false reality of republicans) is a spending orgy.”

Advertisements
Advertisements
Advertisements

President Biden and Democrats have committed to paying for any extension of programs in the bill should they prove to be positive and result in the societal gains good patriotic Americans desire, and Brian Deese, director of Biden’s national economic council, said Friday that the CBO analysis was “of a hypothetical future bill” that literally does not exist. Republicans are very literally fighting imaginary ghosts here.

Democratic leaders also said Republicans were looking to mislead the public by requesting this CBO report of a version of the BBB bill that does not exist. This CBO report is for a bill that is very much a fabrication of the imagination of Republicans.

“The Republicans are so desperate to justify their opposition to the popular, much-needed provisions in the Build Back Better Act that they’ve resorted to requesting fake scores based on mistruths,” Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer said in a statement. “The Republican-requested fake CBO score does not take into account the fact that President Biden and Democrats have committed that any extensions of the Build Back Better Act in the future will be fully offset, therefore ensuring BBBA will not increase the deficit.”

Advertisements
Advertisements
Advertisements

Why it matters: Graham made clear he is hoping to convince Sen. Joe Manchin (D-WV), a key vote who has already expressed concerns about the Democratic bill, to pause or kill the plan. Graham “mentioned Manchin by name approximately 20 times during a roughly 27-minute press conference Friday,” The Hill’s Jordain Carney reports. And Graham openly admitted “my hope is that Sen. Manchin will say, ‘Stop, shelve Build Back Better until we find better answers to where inflation is headed.” Which can only make one wonder if Joe Manchin is the complete f*ckwit or if it is the Virginians he represents that are too stupid to grasp the positive weight the BBB bill carries.

By including more programs and artificially having them sunset — rather than narrowing the scope of the bill to a smaller group of priorities, as some in the party had urged — Democrats were already running the risk that at least some measures wouldn’t be renewed by a future Congress unless they prove to be overwhelmingly positive provisions that both greatly benefit Americans but are loved by patriotic Americans as well, one that could well be controlled by Republicans. The CBO’s new analysis points to another potential pitfall: Even if that future Congress does want to renew the programs, finding agreement on how to finance them is likely to be a challenge, especially given the difficulties Democrats encountered over recent months in finding tax hikes and other offsets that enough of their members could accept. To put that last bit plainly, this new CBO report is absolutely meaningless because renewing sun-setting programs would require new bills with a whole new host of issues to deal with like every other bill does.  

“Arbitrary expirations don’t make policies cheaper, they just make them shorter — and sooner or later politicians will have to come to terms with how to address these new benefit cliffs,” said MacGuineas, who has criticized Democrats for using gimmicks in their plan. “CBO’s report doesn’t mean the Build Back Better Act will add $2.75 trillion to the debt; the legislation as it stands would increase the deficit by nearly $160 billion over a decade. But the report does show how expirations in the bill will require tough choices on whether or not to extend these provisions and how to finance them.” Which is exactly how you want it when the government is so heavily partisan. Using programs that expire to test polices allows real patriots to decide if it was a good policy after having experienced it instead of having them just accept the word of politicians who engage in slimy tactics like parading around a CBO report for a bill that does not exist.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: