Jodi O’Malley, a registered nurse
and HHS insider (she is not an “insider” she just works at an HHS hospital. Unlike what is implied, she has no special information or advanced knowledge. She is very literally just an uninformed nurse secretly recording an equally ignorant doctor.) secretly recorded conversations with her colleagues at HHS corroborating passively entertaining her concerns with the COVID-19 vaccine. And, to literally no one’s surprise, O’Queef conveniently limits the video recorded push back, from fellow doctors, on O’Malley and Dr. Gonzales deranged misinformation in the video.
In the following conversation, O’Malley was discussing with Dr. Maria Gonzales, an ER doctor, how the federal government won’t report a patient suffering from heart inflammation after taking the injection. VAERS is a self-reporting system, just over 7,000 cases of myocarditis have been reported to VAERS. 77% of those cases no longer had symptoms within 7 days when researchers followed up with those reporting their own symptoms.
Dr. Gonzales: “The problem in here is that they are not doing the studies. People that had [COVID] and the people that have been vaccinated — they’re not doing any antibody testing.” Except they are, and O’Queef actually cuts off a doctor who is challenging Dr. Gonzales’ lie.
O’Malley: “Now, you got this guy in Room Four who got his second dose of the [COVID] vaccine on Tuesday and has been short of breath. Okay? Now his BNP is elevated. D diver elevated, ALT, all his liver enzymes are elevated. His PTPTINR is elevated.”
Dr. Gonzales: “He’s probably got myocarditis!” –He probably does have myocarditis. Myocarditis is a symptom of covid and a mild version has been reported among some people who receive the vaccine, although ¾ of cases from the vaccine abate within a week unlike lasting version that occurs with covid. Unfortunately neither Dr. Gonzales nor O’Malley seem to be aware of this.
Dr. Gonzales: “All this is bullshit. Now probably myocarditis due to the vaccine.”
Dr. Gonzales: “But now, they [government] are not going to blame the vaccine.”- Unfortunately for Tweedle Dee and Tweedle Dum, they [the government] do acknowledge adverse effects. In fact, there is an entire reporting system for it and everything. This is either lying with malicious intent, or just unabashed stupidity.
O’Malley: “Well and you know what — but he has an obligation to report that doesn’t he? –Who does? The patient? Yes. VAERS is a self-report system.
Dr. Gonzales: “They are not reporting.”-Except they are reporting.
O’Malley: “Right!” –Wrong!
Dr. Gonzales: “Because they want to shove it under the mat.”- Watching the video makes it VERY clear that O’Malley sought out the stupidest doctor she could find in order to record uninformed gossip in an attempt to pass it off as secret knowledge of a grand conspiracy.
O’Mally told Project Veritas founder James O’Keefe that the patient in question, a 30-something year-old woman, was one of many patients she saw who suffered from adverse reactions after receiving the COVID jab. This is not a news story, this is scare porn for the uninformed. Negative side effects from the vaccine, which are reported unlike dumb and dumber would have you believe, are mild versions of the symptoms that Covid causes.
“How many did you see?” O’Keefe asked of the patients.
“Oh, I’ve seen dozens of people come in with adverse reactions [to the COVID vaccine],” O’Malley said.
If this isn’t all complete anti-vax dogsh*t, and O’Mally honestly believes that all these adverse reactions are occurring unreported, why does she not report them herself?
“So, what the responsibility on everyone is — is to gather that data and report it. If we’re not gathering [COVID vaccine] data and reporting it, then how are we going to say that this is safe and approved for use?” –This is only a self-admission of not reporting. O’Malley has no knowledge of other doctors not reporting. All she really knows is that she is not reporting anything to VAERS, a self-admitted shirking of ethical duties by a health care “professional.”
In another recorded conversation, O’Malley spoke to Deanna Paris, another registered nurse at HHS to compare what they have witnessed related to COVID-19 vaccine side effects.
Paris: “It’s a shame they [government] are not treating people [with COVID] like they’re supposed to, like they should. I think they want people to die.”
O’Malley: “How many have you seen that have gotten vaccinated here?”
Paris: “That got sick from the side effects? A lot.”
O’Malley: “A lot?”
Paris: “Have you seen it too?”
O’Malley: “Yeah, and I’m like, who’s writing the VAERS reports?”
Paris: “Nobody because it takes over a half hour to write the damn thing.” –Here is the real smoking gun from this inevitable dumpster fire of a propaganda outlet. This is an acknowledgement that none of what O’Queef and O’Malley are trying to assert is true. VAERS reports that aren’t being completed isn’t due to an order from the Hospital, or a mandate from the government, but instead because it’s inconvenient to do paperwork.
O’Malley told O’Keefe that she was stirred into action after witnessing a coworker coerced into taking the vaccine against her religious beliefs. If you wouldn’t let a modern Aztec temple be erected to commit ritualistic human sacrifice/cannibalism because it’s their religious beliefs, then it’s time to drop the “vaccinated against their religious beliefs” bullsh*t talking point.
“What prompted me to do this was when I was House Supervisor one night, and one of my coworkers had taken the [COVID] vaccine two weeks ago, and she didn’t want to. She went throughout this entire pandemic working in the intensive care unit, which pretty much was a COVID unit,” O’Malley said.
“She didn’t want to take [the COVID vaccine] because of her religious beliefs and she was coerced into taking it. It’s like nobody — nobody should have to decide between their livelihood, being ‘a part of the team in the hospital,’ or take the [COVID] vaccine.” Not only is it perfectly fine for a company to require their employees to take precautionary measures when working in a high risk environment, we would never accept a religious exemption for OSHA violations.
When asked if she was afraid of speaking out against the government, O’Malley said her faith informs her decisions and she
concluded make believes the government covering up critical data is “evil at the highest level.” –It would be if it weren’t made up bullsh*t.
“It’s my career, you know? It’s how I help people. But am I afraid? I wouldn’t necessarily say I am afraid because my faith lies in God and not man,” O’Malley said. “So, I have two older kids that are on their own, and I have a twelve-year-old at home that I care for on my own, but you know, what kind of person would I be if I knew all of this — this is evil. This is evil at the highest level. You have the FDA, you have the CDC, that are both supposed to be protecting us, but they are under the government, and everything that we’ve done so far is unscientific.” –The problem here is that literally none of her accusations are supported by this endeavor. The FDA and the CDC are both independent institutions neither of which take direct marching orders from Washington. Not to mention the fact that not even Washington is in agreement at all times. Add the fact that the Hospitals are also individual from each other and have their own management systems and you’re already three to four degrees of separation away, and you haven’t even added to the fact that each of these institutions are made up of hundreds to thousands of individuals themselves.
At the end of the day, it’s about your health, and you can never get that back — and about your freedom, and about living in a peaceful society, and I’m like, ‘no.’ No. This is the hill that I will die on,” she added.
This is just plain manipulative bullshit. The video makes clear, by the end, that Project Veritas’ entire point is that to push Ivermectin as a treatment for Covid as the video ends with O’Malley stating two bold faced lies, “And then you have a medication [Ivermectin] that has been shown effective, it hasn’t, and surely has no adverse reactions for trying it.”-There are.
These lies are followed by secret recordings of O’Malley and Pharmacist Gayle Lundberg. O’Malley is specifically asking about using Ivermectin on patients and Lundberg pushes back against off label treatments because that’s what allowed them to try Hydroxychloroquine. It not only wasn’t effective against treating Covid, it was harmful to those who received off label treatment and deprived those who use it for authorized treatments like lupus and malaria.
“And so physicians can’t prescribe off-label use medication here?” O’Malley asks Lundberg.
“Not for Covid. They did it with hydroxychloroquine, and … it was really bad.” Retorts Lundberg.
This exchange demonstrates that previously the hospital did jump on early findings and that came back to bite them in the ass. So they are not going to make the same mistake with Ivermectin.
The idea that Ivermectin can treat covid comes from a study using Ivermectin to treat the hepatitis virus in mice. Using very high doses of Ivermectin prohibited the virus from accessing the cell nuclei. Covid also uses the same process to insert itself into the cell nuclei, so it was hypothesized that perhaps Ivermectin could be used to treat covid too.
Even in the hepatitis study, it took doses very close to what is administer to horses/livestock, which is also the dosage that has been sending people to hospitals with Ivermectin overdose. Don’t worry, it gets worse. In vitro studies on Ivermectin’s ability to prohibit the virus, that causes Covid, from accessing cell nuclei required doses 10 times higher than what was used to prohibit the hepatitis virus from accessing cell nuclei.
Ivermectin is not approved to treat Covid, because even in vitro studies showed that it would take an extremely lethal dose to treat Covid.
That’s it. It’s not some grand conspiracy. It’s not 1984. It’s not Big Pharma, or the Illuminati, the Bilderberg group, or any narrative that helps make the world seem less chaotic to the infantile. It simply isn’t safe to give people doses of medication 100 times higher than is safe for their consumption.